Version 3.2
Historic Green Matching Enhancements
1. Improved Green Matching Accuracy:
The success rate of Green Matching for bank feeds has historically been lower than targeted. To address this, the process has been updated to include the following steps:
Bank Transaction Navigation: Before initiating reconciliation, the robot now navigates to the Bank Transactions page for each account.
Transaction History Extraction: The automation extracts up to 2,000 previous reconciled transactions (approximately 10 pages of data, typically covering around a year’s worth of transactions, or more for accounts with low transaction volumes), to find matches for the new transactions.
2. Advanced Name Matching and Cleanup:
If the initial name matching fails due to low confidence, the following steps are performed:
The robot extracts the Bank Transaction name and applies multiple cleanup routines.
If the remaining name contains six or more characters, all characters following the first number are removed.
Special characters and the term “INV” (from the end of the name) are stripped, leaving only the company name.
Once cleaned, the bot performs a lookup of the company name in the extracted transactions, opening the most recent occurrence in a new tab. The invoice line is extracted and compared with the corresponding invoice reconciliation line. If a match is confirmed, the transaction is classified as a Green Match, and the system proceeds with the reconciliation.
Fix to Cash Coding
3. Error Handling in Cash Coding:
An increase in errors was observed when the automation could not confirm whether any cash coding actions had been performed, particularly when there were no applicable transactions.
To resolve this, selector logic has been enhanced to eliminate such errors and improve the accuracy of cash coding operations.